feanonmod: official art (Default)
Fire Emblem Anon Mod ([personal profile] feanonmod) wrote in [community profile] feanons2014-04-14 12:34 pm
Entry tags:

part 3 kris, try not to fall in love with me!

Aaand now we're now onto part 3!

Same as usual, make sure to read the rules linked below before posting. If you have any questions or otherwise need to get in touch with me for any reason, feel free to contact me in the post also linked below!

Image Code:


As a note, images larger than 600 x 600 must be linked! Anything larger than that will be deleted. Also, please make sure to read the rules in regards to this meme's policy on posting other people's fanart.

Rules & Venting Guidelines | Contact | Latest Page (Flat View)

VENTING: (PLEASE READ THE RULES & VENTING GUIDELINES BEFORE POSTING)
Canon | General Fandom | Fans

FEEDBACK

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

Re: and also a response to the other two anons above

(Anonymous) 2014-04-17 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I'll concede that maybe some anons did come down hard on the OP. But it's easy to be rubbed the wrong way by someone who posts about it in the fashion of long, drawn-out meta. :/ And, I might add, OP was pretty harsh on the anon who replied too, but no one's pointing THIS out.

Re: and also a response to the other two anons above

(Anonymous) 2014-04-17 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)
tbf, ayrt was more or less ignoring 95% of op's original response to them so i'm not going to blame op for being harsh here.

Re: and also a response to the other two anons above

(Anonymous) 2014-04-17 09:50 pm (UTC)(link)
It...didn't look like they were? I think OP just accused them of "missing the point" because ayrt disagreed with them.

Re: and also a response to the other two anons above

(Anonymous) 2014-04-17 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
that's... not what actually happened, anon. op said ayrt didn't address the points made in their original response to them and was trying to go onto a different argument entirely.

this is op's original response to ayrt: http://feanons.dreamwidth.org/1400.html?thread=1549688#cmt1549688

yes, it's tl;dr, but whether or not you agree with their argument isn't the point i'm trying to make here.

here is ayrt's response: http://feanons.dreamwidth.org/1400.html?thread=1554296#cmt1554296

here, they didn't actually address most of the points op made and instead latched onto one argument trying to defend their own (ayrt's) response on how people who dislike tharja 'are just jealous'.

not exactly going to blame op here for wanting to hear a response that actually addresses their response when they did the same for ayrt and then ducking out when it became pretty obvious when ayrt had no intention of actually addressing those points in op's first response.

sa

(Anonymous) 2014-04-17 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
got redundant in that last paragraph whoops

Re: and also a response to the other two anons above

(Anonymous) 2014-04-17 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
First of all, the comment about Fushigi Yuugi and Miaka was made by a whole different anon, not ayrt. Second of all, ayrt DID acknowledge that OP had a point but wanted to discuss their views of the whole thing. Even if the argument could have done without the "just jealous" business, they weren't being rude to OP.

All they did was disagree with OP, let's not act like they committed the crime of the century.

Re: and also a response to the other two anons above

(Anonymous) 2014-04-17 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Second of all, ayrt DID acknowledge that OP had a point but wanted to discuss their views of the whole thing.

if you're talking about this response: http://feanons.dreamwidth.org/1400.html?thread=1547640#cmt1547640

then op did respond to that with their own views, but they never got an actual response to the post they made to ayrt. if ayrt did re-enter the conversation at some point, they never actually addressed any of the previous points made in op's first response to them.

All they did was disagree with OP, let's not act like they committed the crime of the century.

not saying they were, but i can understand why op would be frustrated.

Re: and also a response to the other two anons above

(Anonymous) 2014-04-17 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh...well, I guess they have the right to be frustrated. But they seemed like they were making a federal case out of it, ayrt may have been too quick to whip out the "just jealous" chestnut but she wasn't outright accusing OP of it. Hell, I thought OP made some valid points too. I personally think the female dark mage outfit is hot but I do understand the frustration with the disconnect between it and Tharja's actual personality.