feanonmod: official art (Default)
Fire Emblem Anon Mod ([personal profile] feanonmod) wrote in [community profile] feanons2014-04-14 12:34 pm
Entry tags:

part 3 kris, try not to fall in love with me!

Aaand now we're now onto part 3!

Same as usual, make sure to read the rules linked below before posting. If you have any questions or otherwise need to get in touch with me for any reason, feel free to contact me in the post also linked below!

Image Code:


As a note, images larger than 600 x 600 must be linked! Anything larger than that will be deleted. Also, please make sure to read the rules in regards to this meme's policy on posting other people's fanart.

Rules & Venting Guidelines | Contact | Latest Page (Flat View)

VENTING: (PLEASE READ THE RULES & VENTING GUIDELINES BEFORE POSTING)
Canon | General Fandom | Fans

FEEDBACK

IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT

da

(Anonymous) 2014-05-06 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
...oh my god, anon. i had some doubts about the anons' points against this place, but now i see what they mean since you have been pointing and screaming "HA HA YOU OBVIOUSLY ARE THE SAME PERSON AND YOU ARE SUCH A LYING LIAR BECAUSE IT'S ONLY YOU WHO SAYS THIS BECAUSE TOTALLY NO ONE ELSE AGREES WITH YOU NOPE" the entire time. if you had actually taken the time to actually address what the detractors have said, then maybe i would see what you mean. however, as it stands? you being unable to make an actual argument to address the negative points made against this place has been making me lean towards the detractors' arguments instead of your "rebuttal".

come back when you can make an actual argument, anon. because know what? you trying too hard to come off as this badass troll is doing you and the rest of us at the meme no favors at all.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2014-05-06 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
If you ask me, EVERYONE in this thread is being an idiot. Yes, even the ones making valid points.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2014-05-06 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
except the people with valid points actually EXPLAINED why they had a problem with feanons. the people responding to that having been jumping and screaming "NO, NO YOU'RE WRONG AND OBVIOUSLY LYING BECAUSE I SAID SO! YOU'RE ALSO ALL THE SAME PERSON BECAUSE I SAID SO!"

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2014-05-06 10:51 am (UTC)(link)
a normally empty wankgate thread AND a normally slow anonmeme SUDDENLY are "full" of activity after someone starts throwing a fit on WG because they can't shit on feanons as much as they like?

sure, not sameanoning, sure.

sa

(Anonymous) 2014-05-06 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
also, before i get accused of being the anon before you (because anyone who doesn't have a positive opinion of feanons clearly are all the same person), you caught me but not quite:

i'm the clone of the anon before you. close though.