feanonmod: official art (Default)
Fire Emblem Anon Mod ([personal profile] feanonmod) wrote in [community profile] feanons2014-04-14 12:34 pm
Entry tags:

part 3 kris, try not to fall in love with me!

Aaand now we're now onto part 3!

Same as usual, make sure to read the rules linked below before posting. If you have any questions or otherwise need to get in touch with me for any reason, feel free to contact me in the post also linked below!

Image Code:

As a note, images larger than 600 x 600 must be linked! Anything larger than that will be deleted. Also, please make sure to read the rules in regards to this meme's policy on posting other people's fanart.

Rules & Venting Guidelines | Contact | Latest Page (Flat View)

Canon | General Fandom | Fans



Re: +infinity

(Anonymous) 2014-05-06 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you for proving my point? I've never even been to wankgate, and I'm not the same person as anyone else in this thread except the one you replied to just now. I'm not the person you replied to before, and I have nothing invested in them; I just happen to agree with them.

Thing is you can constantly, over and over and over, claim that anyone who disagrees with you is the same person because anon. Gotta wonder if that's why you're here in the first place. It's certainly very convenient for you to never have to examine your actions if you can just convince yourself it's all one person.

And hahaha typing style. That's such a stupid reason. Half the people here type exactly the same, half the people in wankgate type exactly the same. Capitalizing sentences and not using tildes ~ for ~ emphasis ~ everywhere doesn't make me the same person as everyone else who does those things.

And lol, I'm not raphi or whoever you're claiming up and down the thread me or any of the other anons are. I don't even think she fucking knows about this place. And I'm not one of the six or seven other people you might accuse me of being either, I'm someone who's sick of us being bullies. You look fucking ridiculous accusing multiple people of being the same person.

I like how you refuse to even consider the possibility that multiple people might have a problem with the 'feanons is flawless' attitude. It's not even on the radar to you, is it? Wow. I'd like a set of those rose-coloured glasses you've got there.

What's the actual harm in considering--not definitely saying, just considering--that we could've done something wrong, that multiple people might not like how we go about things? Generally considering one's own actions is how one comes across as not being a jackass. Just. Think about it. For a bit. Think, not immediately turn around and insist I'm the same person as the other people here or the clearly multiple people at wankgate. Okay?

Re: +infinity

(Anonymous) 2014-05-06 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
looks like someone got caught in their lies and is now desperately trying to cover up the smell of their shit!

sure, i'm really gonna believe you from now on


(Anonymous) 2014-05-06 01:34 am (UTC)(link)
...oh my god, anon. i had some doubts about the anons' points against this place, but now i see what they mean since you have been pointing and screaming "HA HA YOU OBVIOUSLY ARE THE SAME PERSON AND YOU ARE SUCH A LYING LIAR BECAUSE IT'S ONLY YOU WHO SAYS THIS BECAUSE TOTALLY NO ONE ELSE AGREES WITH YOU NOPE" the entire time. if you had actually taken the time to actually address what the detractors have said, then maybe i would see what you mean. however, as it stands? you being unable to make an actual argument to address the negative points made against this place has been making me lean towards the detractors' arguments instead of your "rebuttal".

come back when you can make an actual argument, anon. because know what? you trying too hard to come off as this badass troll is doing you and the rest of us at the meme no favors at all.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2014-05-06 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
If you ask me, EVERYONE in this thread is being an idiot. Yes, even the ones making valid points.

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2014-05-06 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
except the people with valid points actually EXPLAINED why they had a problem with feanons. the people responding to that having been jumping and screaming "NO, NO YOU'RE WRONG AND OBVIOUSLY LYING BECAUSE I SAID SO! YOU'RE ALSO ALL THE SAME PERSON BECAUSE I SAID SO!"

Re: da

(Anonymous) 2014-05-06 10:51 am (UTC)(link)
a normally empty wankgate thread AND a normally slow anonmeme SUDDENLY are "full" of activity after someone starts throwing a fit on WG because they can't shit on feanons as much as they like?

sure, not sameanoning, sure.


(Anonymous) 2014-05-06 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
also, before i get accused of being the anon before you (because anyone who doesn't have a positive opinion of feanons clearly are all the same person), you caught me but not quite:

i'm the clone of the anon before you. close though.